The following tables where adapter from Annie Richards website
"The Birth of Venus - Articles and Information", which is no
longer with us :(, with her permission by me.
Her source was "...derived from a US Army sponsored study done in the 1970s(?)...".
Enter a height in decimal to see
how your measurements would be proportioned as Female and Male.
For example a height of 5' - 7" would be enterd as
"67" for inches, or "170.18" for centimeters.
The results should be good for males 5-0(152cm) to 6-4(193cm) or
females 4-8(142cm) to 5-11(180cm), this covers most people, or
female to male comparisons of the same height, 5-0(152cm) to 5-11(180cm), the female/male overlap.
Standardized Body Proportions for a height of 67in
Height from ground for |
| Body Location (Multiplier Male, Female) | Male | Female | Male - Female | | Top of Head (1.00, 1.00) | 67.00 | 67.00 | 0.00 | | Shoulder (0.826, 0.817) | 55.34 | 54.74 | 0.60 | | Nipple (0.730, 0.726) | 48.91 | 48.64 | 0.27 | | Elbow (0.628, 0.630) | 42.08 | 42.21 | (-0.13) | | Waist (0.607, 0.623) | 40.67 | 41.74 | (-1.07) | | Crotch (0.482, 0.465) | 32.29 | 31.16 | 1.13 | | Knee (top) (0.305, 0.295) | 20.43 | 19.77 | 0.66 |
|
Difference Measuremants |
| Difference Between Locations (Multiplier Male, Female) | Male | Female | Male - Female | | Torso Length (Shoulder - Crotch) (0.344, 0.352) | 23.05 | 23.58 | (-0.53) | | Shoulder - Knee (0.521, 0.522) | 34.91 | 34.97 | (-0.06) |
|
Head / Hand / Foot |
| Measurement (Multiplier Male, Female) | Male | Female | Male - Female | | Head Circumference (0.321, 0.337) | 21.51 | 22.58 | (-1.07) | | Head Breadth (0.087, 0.089) | 5.83 | 5.96 | (-0.13) | | Ear Length (0.036, 0.032) | 2.41 | 2.14 | 0.27 | | Nick Circumference (0.216, 0.204) | 14.47 | 13.67 | 0.80 | | Palm Length (0.061, 0.061) | 4.09 | 4.09 | 0.00 | | Hand Length (0.109, 0.111) | 7.30 | 7.44 | (-0.14) | | Finger Length (0.048, 0.050) | 3.22 | 3.35 | (-0.13) | | Hand Breadth (0.051, 0.047) | 3.42 | 3.15 | 0.27 | | Hand Circumference (0.124, 0.112) | 8.31 | 7.50 | 0.81 | | Heel / Ankle Circumference (0.196, 0.189) | 13.13 | 12.66 | 0.47 | | Foot Circumference at Ball (0.143, 0.139) | 9.58 | 9.31 | 0.27 | | Foot Breadth (0.057, 0.054) | 3.82 | 3.62 | 0.20 | | Foot Length (0.153, 0.149) | 10.25 | 9.98 | 0.27 |
|
Miscellaneous |
| Measurement (Multiplier Male, Female) | Male | Female | Male - Female | | Bust (0.544, 0.547) | 36.45 | 36.65 | (-0.20) | | Waist (0.472, 0.438) | 31.62 | 29.35 | 2.27 | | Hip (0.551, 0.588) | 36.92 | 39.40 | (-2.48) | | Trunk Circumference (0.945, 0.946) | 63.31 | 63.38 | (-0.07) | | Adjusted Trunk Circumference (0.514, 0.440) | 34.44 | 29.48 | 4.96 | | Bra Size (Band Cup) (using Adj. Trunk Cir.) | 36 AAA | 34 C | |
|
Notes on the above table.
- "Trunk Circumference" and "Adjusted Trunk Circumference".
The multipliers given on Annies' page seem wrong. I'm 5'9" and
my trunk is not 65.27" as it would be using the numbers given on
the "Trunk Circumference" line which uses 0.945 for males and 0.946
for females, also doesn't a female have a smaller trunk than a
male, but the multipliers are the other way around, so I played
around and came up with 0.514 for males, and 0.440 for females, these
seem to give close results, but are just a guess on my part.
- "Bra Size (Band Cup) (using Adj. Trunk Cir.)".
The whole bra size is only a close approximation based on a couple of
retail store catalogs. I round both Trunk and Bust before doing the calcs.
For a better answer plug the Adj-Trk and Bust
numbers into the bra size calc page
at 85b.org
Part of the reply I got from Annie to an eMail I sent her, in it
she gives her permission to use her info as the bases for this page
and talks about her source.
Dear Robyn
...snipped...
I have no problem about you using any data you want from my website, thanks for asking for
permission!
The "Body Size" page generates an amazing amount of emails - often from students. Clearly, and
perhaps surprisingly, there is not much else on the web with that kind of info. My source was
a book that I borrowed perhaps 3 years ago from a library. Basically the info it gave was
derived from a US Army sponsored study done in the 1970s(?), this measured the physiques of
several thousand students and was undertaken to make sure that the Army ordered the right
uniform sizes! Sadly I can't remember the name of the book, nor could I find it when I looked
again a while ago so I can't check the suspect data, but it could well be a typo on my part.
Portions copyright Robyn C. Wright and Annie Richards